A law professor answers: are corporations citizens?

Share
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
Stetson University College of Law professor Ciara Torres-Spelliscy. By Seán Kinane / WMNF News (25 July 2016).

Are corporations citizens and how have courts changed the role of corporations in society and in elections? We look at these topics with our guest in the studio, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy. She’s an associate professor of law at Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport, Florida. Her new book is called Corporate Citizen? An Argument for the Separation of Corporation and State.

Listen to the whole show here:

We began our conversation where the book begins, waiting for the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision on January 21, 2010. I asked what that day was like for legal scholars monitoring corporate power, what the case was about and why she considers it a legal turning point?

We heard about examples of courts granting corporations new legal rights in terms of commercial speech, political speech and religious rights. But there was no corresponding increase in corporate responsibilities.

The Citizens United decision didn’t create corporate personhood; that idea has been around in the Supreme Court since at least 1886 in a case called Santa Clara County.

Often corporate rights have advanced because they gained protections afforded under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Yeah, that’s right, the one that ensured freedom for slaves.

In the 1970s the court’s Belloti decision allowed corporations to spend unlimited amounts on a ballot initiative.

corporations
Corporate Citizen? A 2016 book by Stetson University College of Law professor Ciara Torres-Spelliscy.

Torres-Spelliscy differentiates between corporate personhood and citizenship – especially with respect to the Constitution’s Comity Clause. She thinks this may be a way for lawyers in the future to fight back against corporate rights; it could be a legal basis to challenge the direction of a pro-business Supreme Court.

She calls the current Roberts Court the “corporate court” – with help from Justice Alito also pushing corporate rights. But we also talked about SCOTUS decisions that equivocate on corporate rights or corporate personhood?

We also looked at the implications for a Court without late Justice Antonin Scalia – and whether a new justice will be seated next year or even further in the future than that.

Watch video of this interview in three parts: 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

You may also like

student meal
Next school year Hillsborough public schools are offering free meals

Hillsborough Public Schools are offering students free meals for the...

Correspondence Through Poetry. A Mind-Numbing Week.

Father Verses Sons: A Correspondence in Poems by Herbert Gold...

The sound of change: Music’s influence on anti-war and human rights movements

Throughout history, music has served as a powerful catalyst for...

a man in a tye dye shirt talking on a radio microphone
Recreational pot for Florida is on the ballot this fall—let’s talk about it

In four months, Florida voters have the opportunity to vote...

Ways to listen

WMNF is listener-supported. That means we don't advertise like a commercial station, and we're not part of a university.

Ways to support

WMNF volunteers have fun providing a variety of needed services to keep your community radio station alive and kickin'.

Follow us on Instagram

The Morning Show Thursday
Player position: